R.SUBHASH REDDY, VIPUL M.PANCHOLI
TEJASVI ATUL NAHATA – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT – Respondent
R. SUBHASH REDDY, J.
1. The original petitioner in Special Civil Application No. 2009 of 2018 has filed this Letters Patent Appeal under clause 15 of Letters Patent, aggrieved the order dated 12.02.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge. By the aforesaid order, the learned Single Judge dismissed the petition filed by the appellant – original petitioner in limine.
2. The original petitioner has filed Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the prayers which reads as under :
“16 (A) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondent to consider the case of the petitioner and to correct the Category AC 3 in which the petitioner is wrongly included to right category AC 6 and allow the petitioner to participate in the admission process of said course of Post Graduate Programme in Management (PGP 201820) as she possesses the requisite qualification as prescribed by the Respondent in its eligibility criteria for shortlisting and selection for admission to the said course especially in the background that equally situated student
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.