IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
SHREE CORPORATION - Appellant
Versus
ANILBHAI PURANBHAI BANSAL - DIRECTOR FOR & BEHALF OF - Respondent
Special Criminal Application No. 3653, 3654, 3655, 3656, 3657 of 2012
Decided on : 23-03-2018
1. As the issues raised in all the captioned applications are interconnected and the parties are also the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Criminal Application No.3653 of 2012 is treated as the lead matter.
3. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants-original accused Nos.2 to 4, have prayed for the following reliefs;
“(A) To quash the process, complaint and proceedings of Criminal Case No.1241 of 2008 pending in the Court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Court No.8) Ahmedabad after setting aside the order dated 21.07.2011 passed on Exh.30 of Criminal Case No.1241 of 2008 by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Court No.8) Ahmedabad which is confirmed by the City Sessions Court by the order dated 17.02.2012 passed in Criminal Revision Application No.447 of 2011;
(B) To stay the further proceedings of Criminal Case No.1241 of 2008 pending in the Court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Court No.8) Ahmedabad till the final disposal of this petition;
(C) To grant any further relief that may be deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the matter.”
4. The case of the writ applicants, in their own words, as pleaded in their writ applications, is as under;
“(1) The respondent No.1(the complainant for short) has filed below described five private complaints in the Court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad which are pending as on date in N.I. Court No.8, for the offence punishable under section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the act for short). The particulars of the said five complaints are as under;
Sr. No.
C.C. No. (New)
Cheque No.
Amount
Date of cheque
1
1239/08
122305
18,00,000
19.10.96
2
1242/08
122304
22,00,000
19.10.96
3
1240/08
122261
18,00,000
17.10.96
4
1241/08
122262
22,00,000
17.10.96
5
1243/08
122203
28,43,786
19.10.96
Total=
1.08.43,786
The above mentioned five complaints were initially numbered as Criminal Case No.104 to 108 of 1997 respectively.
2. The petitioners have filed this petition for quashing of the complaint of Criminal Case No.1241 of 2008. Annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE-A is a copy of the said complaint.
3. After issuing all the five cheques mentioned in paragraph No.1 above, the petitioners have paid on 30.10.1996 Rs.12,40,000/- by two cheques to the complainant and hence from before and on 10.01.1997, when the above said complaints were filed, the petitioners owed to the complainants Rs.96,03,766/- and not Rs.1,08,43,706/- for which he filed the above said complaints which are registered as the above described five criminal cases.
4. Apart from the complainant there were and are 7 other creditors of the petitioners. Particulars of the said 8 creditors in all including the complainant are as under;
Name of creditors
Amount settled under MOU
1. Zaveri & Co. Exports
1,49,48,720/-
2. M/s. M.D. Textile Industries Ltd. (Complainant)
96.03,276/-
3. M/s. Modern Impex
92,54,277/-
4 M/s. Mahavir Bullion (Bhavnagar)
83,32,550/-
5 Deep Exports
29,18,700/-
6 M/s. H. Kumar Jems Pvt. Ltd.
26,45,458/-
7 M/s. Maneklal Soni (Dahod)
39,08,750/-
8. Girishkumar Lalchand Shroff
42,24,000/-
Total=
5,58,35,731/-
All the above 8 creditors are herein after referred to as the “Syndicate”
5. Thereafter on 07.12.1996, said syndicate of the creditors, including the complainant, entered into and executed an agreement titled as Memorandum of Understanding (MOU for short) with the petitioners and one Bhanumatiben Bhailalbhai Dahyabhai, the mother of the petitioners Nos.2 to 4. Annexed herewith and marked as and marked as ANNEXURE-B i
Arvind Maneklal Tailor vs. State of Gujarat & Anr.
R. Gopikuttan Pillai vs. Sankara Narayanan Nair
Rahul Builders vs. Arihant Fertilizers & Chemicals And Another
Central Bank of India & Another vs. Saxons Farms & Others 1999(8) SCC 221
Suman Sethi vs. Ajay K. Churiwala
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.