SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Guj) 1078

M.R.SHAH, G.B.SHAH
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Nainaben – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Dakshesh Mehta.
For the Respondent: Ajay R. Mehta.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. As common question of law and facts arise in both these appeals and as such they are cross-appeals arising out of the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal, both these appeals are heard, decided and disposed of by this common judgment and order. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Fast Track Court No. 1) at Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') dated 31.1.2007 in M.A.C.P. No. 419 of 2000 by which the learned Tribunal has partly allowed the said appeal and has awarded a total sum of Rs. 6,93,000/- to the original claimants with running interest at the rate of 7.5 per cent per annum from the date of the application till the actual realization, the appellant National Insurance Co. Ltd. has preferred First Appeal No. 4485 of 2007.

1.1 Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal insofar as awarding a total sum of Rs. 6,93,000/- with running interest at the rate of 7.5 per cent per annum from the date of the application till realization, the original claimants have preferred Fir













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top