SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Guj) 921

R.P.DHOLARIA, M.R.SHAH
GEETABA – Appellant
Versus
GOVIND MALSI DANIYA – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Hardik C. Rawal, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi), Court No. 7, Kutch Bhuj (hereinafter referred to as the "Tribunal") dated 27.9.2013 passed in M.A.C.P. No. 20 of 2000, by which, the learned Tribunal has dismissed the said application for getting the compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), the appellants herein original claimants have preferred present First Appeal. The facts leading to the present First Appeal in nutshell are as under:

"1.1. That vehicular accident which took place on 27.9.1999 the husband of the original claimant No. 1 and father of the claimant Nos. 2 to 4 Kishorsingh Mahipatsing Jadeja who was driving the scooter met with Tempo bearing No. GJ12U5659 driven by the original opponent No. 1 and he died on the spot. That the original claimants filed MACP No. 20 of 2000 before the Tribunal claiming compensation for the death of deceased Kishorsingh Mahipatsing Jadeja. It appears that application for getting compensation under Section 166 of the Act was preferred on 27.9.1999. It appears that in the said a
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top