SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Guj) 700

S.G SHAH
AMARDIP JAGDIP RAVAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Manan Mehta, Narendra L. Jain, Y.J Patel, Advocates.

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

S.G. SHAH, J.

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Y.J. Patel for the applicant, learned advocate Mr. N.L. Jain for the respondents No.2 and 3 and learned APP Mr. Manan Mehta for the respondent State being a formal party. Since the dispute is under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, between the applicant husband with his wife being respondent No.2 herein and his daughter being respondent No.3 herein. Perused the record.

2. The applicant has challenged the judgment and order dated 11.12.2015 by Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate (Court No.13), Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No.295 of 2011 wherein on application by respondent No.2 wife under the Domestice Violence Act, the trial Court has directed the applicant to pay the amount of Rs.10, 000/- towards maintenance of his wife and daughter w.e.f. 19.11.2011 being the date of application while rejecting all other prayers by the wife.

3. The applicant has also challenged the judgment and order dated 10.3.2017 by Addl. Sessions Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Ahmedabad, Court No.20 in Criminal Appeal Nos.5 of 2016 and 15 of 2016; being cross appeals preferred by both husband and wife against the above





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top