A.S. SUPEHIA, J.

1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.10.2014, passed in Special Civil Application No.13924 of 2014 by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition preferred by the appellant challenging his termination has been rejected.

2. The brief facts leading to filling of the present appeal are as under:

2.1 The appellant was appointed as an Assistant Professor on 12.10.2011 for a period of two years probation after undergoing the regular selection procedure.

2.2 On 30.08.2013, the appellant was served with a communication calling upon him to fill up the inquiry report annexed with the same before 02.09.2013.

2.3 The appellant by the letter dated 04.09.2013, tendered his reply to the aforesaid communication dated 30.08.2018.

2.4 Thereafter, by the impugned order dated 10.09.2013, the respondent-University terminated the services of the appellant. It is the case of the appellant that the action of the respondent authorities terminating his services on the basis of the resolution passed by the respondent-University being Resolution No.46 is stigmatic in nature and the same is passed without holding a regular departmental inquiry.

2