SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Guj) 895

R.SUBHASH REDDY, VIPUL M.PANCHOLI
B. R. Acharya – Appellant
Versus
Pankajkumar B. Thaker – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
M.D. Rana, K.M. Antani

JUDGMENT :

Vipul M. Pancholi, J.

This Misc. Civil Application is filed under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 by the applicant alleging that the respondents have intentionally and willfully violated the directions issued by this Court in the order dated 01.08.2016 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No.407 of 2010 with Letters Patent Appeal No.423 of 2010, therefore, appropriate proceedings be initiated against the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

2. Heard learned advocate Mr. M.D. Rana appearing for the applicant and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. K.M. Antani for the respondents.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant was dismissed from service on the ground of absenteeism and therefore he initiated proceedings by filing petition before this Court. Ultimately, the Division Bench of this Court passed an order on 01.08.2016 in Letters Patent Appeal No.407 of 2010 with Letters Patent Appeal no.423 of 2010, by which, this Court allowed the appeals and quashed and set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge as also the order passed by the Gujarat Civil Service Tribunal and the order of dismissal passed by the




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top