IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
MAYUR MUKUNDBHAI DESAI - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT AND Ors - Respondent
Special Criminal Application No. 9133 of 2017
Decided on : 17-10-2018
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 304, 297, 337, 338 - Motor Vehicles Act, 1881 - Sections 177 and 184 - Negligence offence - It was alleged in the said FIR that, when the respondent no.2 was going in his i-10 car bearing to his job, at Ring Road to Rajpath Road, the petitioner drove his vehicle being Land Cruiser Car from behind in full speed and overtook the car of the complainant - It is further alleged in the FIR that one motorcycle was going ahead of the car of the respondent No.2 which was dashed by the car of the petitioner herein - Held, What has been highlighted in the two articles referred to above published by "The Times of India" is something very important, serious and a matter of concern - People should pay heed to what has been pointed out in the two articles - In the overall view of the matter, Court have reached to the conclusion that the Court below committed an error in rejecting the discharge application so far as the offence punishable under Section 304 of the I.P.C. is concerned - Impugned order passed by the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, in-charge is hereby quashed - Application dismissed. (Paras 71, 72)
J B PARDIWALA, J.
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant - original accused has prayed for the following reliefs:
"12A. To allow this petition.
B. To quash and set aside FIR being I-CR No.336/2013 registered with Vastrapur Police Station, Ahmedabad and all further proceedings arising therefrom including the chargesheet filed in connection with the said FIR and all proceedings of Sessions Case No.11 of 2015 pending before the Ld. 8th Additional Sessions Judge, at Mirzapur, Ahmedabad (Rural).
C. To quash and set aside the order dated 25.09.2017 passed below Exh. 4 in Sessions Case No.11/2015 by the learned 8th Additional Sessions Judge, at Mirzapur, Ahmedabad (Rural) rejecting the discharge application filed by the petitioner.
D. In the alternative, to direct that no case for proceeding against the petitioner under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is made out.
E. Pending admission, final hearing and disposal of this petition to stay further proceedings of Sessions Case No.11 of 2015 pending before the Ld. 8th Additional Sessions Judge, at Mirzapur, Ahmedabad (Rural).
F. To pass such other and further order/s as deemed fit, just and proper by this Hon'ble Court."
2. As I am inclined to consider the reliefs prayed for in terms of para 12[C] and [D] only, my adjudication shall be in exercise of my supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
3. The points for consideration are as under:
[A] Can the driver of a vehicle be chargesheeted and tried for an offence punishable under Section 304, I.P.C., for his rash and negligent driving if it has resulted in the death of another person?
[B] Is the plea of the driver in such a motor accident that he is liable to be chargesheeted and tried only for an offence punishable under Section 304-A of the I.P.C. sustainable?
4. The case of the applicant herein, in his own words, as pleaded in the application, is as under:
"3.1 The petitioner submits that an FIR being I-CR No.336/2013 came to be registered on 18.09.2013 with Vastrapur Police Station, Ahmedabad against the petitioner herein for the offences punishable under Sections 297, 337, 338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as "IPC") and sections 177 and 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred as "MV Act").
3.2 That it was alleged in the said FIR that on 18.09.2013, when the respondent no.2 was going in his i-10 car bearing No.GJ-1-KA 9955 to his job, at Bopal Ring Road to Rajpath Road, the petitioner drove his vehicle being Land Cruiser Car from behind in full speed and overtook the car of the complainant. It is further alleged in the FIR that one motorcycle was going ahead of the car of the respondent No.2 which was dashed by the car of the petitioner herein. It is alleged that one boy was driving the motorcycle and one girl was a pillion rider and because of the hit the motorcycle, the boy and the girl fell down on the road and were dragged to some distance. It is alleged that both the victims were bleedings profusely. It is further alleged that respondent No. 2 called 108 ambulance and injured were taken to Shalby hospital
3.3 That the respondent No. 2 lodged the FIR and the petitioner herein was arrested and released on bail on the very same day as the offences alleged were bailable. It is submitted that the injured girl succumbed to injuries and she died on 22.09.2013. Therefore, the police submitted a report on 23.09.2013 before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad for addition of Section 304A of the IPC, which was accepted by the learned Magistrate on the very same day.
3.4 That thereafter on 14.11.2013, police submitted report to add section 304 (Part-ll) of the IPC and delete section 304A of the IPC and also requested the learned Magistrate to issue warrant against the petitioner relying on the report of the vehicle manufacturer. That apprehending his arrest, the petitioner filed Criminal Misc. Appl
Alamohan Das Vs. State of West Bengal
Alister Anthony Pareira Vs. State of Maharashtra
Harendra Nath Mandal Vs. State of Bihar
Jacob Mathew Vs. State of Punjab and Anr.
Jail Prakash Vs. State (Delhi Administration
K. P. Raghavan Vs. M. H. Abbas
Kesar Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Keshub Mahindra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Mahadev Prasad Kaushik Vs. State of U.P. and Anr.
Mohd. Aynuddin alias Miyam Vs. State of A.P.
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi Vs. Jitendra Bhimraj Bajja and ors.
Prabhakaran Vs. State of Kerala
Ravi Kapur Vs. State of Rajashtan
State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Rayavarapu
State of Bihar Vs. Ramesh Singh
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ram Prasad
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Sheetla Sahai and ors.
State of Maharashtra and others Vs. Som Nath Thapa and others
State of Maharashtra Vs. Salman Salimkhan
Supdt. and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal Vs. Anil Kumar Bhunja
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.