SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Guj) 1003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R. SUBHASH REDDY, VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, JJ.
Varahi Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. - Appellant
Vs.
State of Gujarat - Respondent
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1202 of 2018; Civil Application No. 1 of 2018; Special Civil Application No. 3358 of 2018
Decided On : 18-09-2018

Advocates Appeared:
B.B. Naik, Adv., Umang R Vyas, Adv., D.M. Devnani, Adv., H.S. Munshaw, Adv.

Headnote:

Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 – Section 65(3) – Cooperatives – Allotment of plots – 45 meters wide Ring Road is to be constructed from 8 plots of members of petitioner society – Such affected persons were accommodated in petitioner society itself by giving them alternate accommodation in common plot as well as internal road of the society – Petitioner society has no grievance with regard to allotment of plots to 5 members on internal road of society – However, main grievance is with regard to allotment of plots to three members in common plot on the ground that common plot is being used by other members of petitioner society for social and other functions – Once Scheme is finalized and sanctioned by State Government, it is not permissible to change location – Variation of Scheme can be done only by State Government – Appeal dismissed. (Paras 11, 14 and 15)

JUDGMENT

Vipul M. Pancholi, J.

This appeal, which is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, is directed against the judgment dated 23.08.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 3358 of 2018, by which, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the petition.

2. Brief facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:

2.1. Petitioner society is a registered Cooperative Housing Society under the provisions of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act. It was registered on 11.05.1967 before the District Registrar, Bhavnagar. The petitioner society had purchased non-agriculture land situated at Revenue Survey No.76 of village: Tarsamiya, Taluka: Bhavnagar by a registered sale deed in the year 1971. Initially there were 56 residential plots on the said land. Lay-out plans etc. were sanctioned by the respondent authorities. As per the said plan, the petitioner society kept common plot as per the rules and regulations prevailing at the relevant time. The said plots were sold to its members by executing different sale deeds. Thereafter the petitioner society has proposed to allot two more plots i.e. plot Nos. 57 and 58 and therefore necessary sanction was obtained from the concerned authority. Plot Nos. 57 and 58 are divided in 8 sub-plots and such sub-plotting was also sanctioned by the concerned authority. Said 8 plots were also sold to 8 different owners who have thereafter constructed residential houses.

2.2. It is the case of the petitioner that there is one common plot situated in the middle of the society which is adjacent to original plot Nos. 12 and 25 and the same is being used for social and other functions by the members of the society. The society is also having excess land in different parts of the society.

2.3. It is further stated that respondent no.1 was of the intention to prepare Town Planning Scheme No.12 and therefore the said scheme was sanctioned by Notification dated 10.08.1998. It is alleged that though the petitioner was affected by the said Town Planning Scheme, hearing was not given to the society before sanctioning the Town Planning Scheme. It is stated that the Government has sanctioned the Town Planning Scheme on 04.03.2014 by which Ring Road having width of 45 meters was sanctioned on 8 plots of original plot Nos. 57 and 58. As per the said scheme, out of said 8 plot holders, 4 members have been allotted land on common plot of the society, whereas other four members have been allotted land on the internal road of the society. It is, therefore, alleged that the action of the respondent authority in allotting the land to 4 members on the common plot of the society is illegal and therefore the petitioner filed the captioned petition in which the petitioner had prayed for the following relief’s:

"(a) A writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may kindly be issued quashing and setting aside the notification dated 04.03.2014 issued by respondent authorities (Annexure-E to the petition) as the same being illegal, arbitrary and irrational, being violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India so far as it provides for reducing the area of common plot of petitioner society and demolition of eight houses of members of society wherein the members are residing with their family members since more than two decades.

(b) A writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may kindly be issued restraining the respondents from allotting society's common plot to private respondents.

(c) to issue appropriate writ, order or direction to respondent no.1 and 2 to consider the opinion of respondent no.3 Town planning Officer dated 04.08.2010 and to accept the suggestion of respondent no.3 and to vary or modify the Town Planning Scheme No.12 of Bhavnagar accordingly;

(d) Pending admis














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top