SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Guj) 1007

J.B.PARDIWALA
Wasim Shamshulhak Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rathin P Raval, Adv., Archana U Amin, Adv.

JUDGMENT

J.B. Pardiwala, J.

This First Appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (for short, 'the Act, 1987'), is at the instance of the original claimant and is directed against the judgment and order dated 6th August 2015 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench at Ahmedabad, in Case No.OA/2012/0226.

2. The short point involved in this Appeal is, whether the appellant, being the elder brother of his deceased handicapped younger brother who died on account of an accident while travelling from Vapi to Lucknow on 31st August 2012 by Train No.19037 (Bandra Terminus - Gorakhpur Avadh Express), could be said to be dependent as defined under Section 123(b) of the Act, 1989 so as to make the claim application maintainable in law.

3. The claim application filed by the appellant herein came to be rejected by the Tribunal only on the short point that a major brother cannot be said to be dependent on his minor brother. Mr.Rathin Raval, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, submitted that the term 'dependent' should not be restricted to only economic dependence but dependence of love, affection, care and protection of the deceased passenger as well.









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top