K.M.THAKER
Agriculture Produce Market Committee – Appellant
Versus
National Horticulture Board – Respondent
K.M. Thaker, J.
Heard Mr. Vaghela, learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Satish Kumar, learned advocate, for Mr. P.M. Dave, learned advocate for respondent No.1 National Horticulture Board and Ms. Amin, learned advocate for respondent No.3 National Bank for Agriculture & Rural Development.
2. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed, inter alia, that:-
"7-B. Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or writ certiorari or writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ order or direction to recall the action of the respondent no.1 of withdrawing the subsidy granted to the petitioner market committee as being illegal and further be pleased to direct the respondents to immediately released the whole amount of subsidy which was sanctioned to the petitioner market committee for the construction of the cold storage and further be pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 24th January, 2014 communicated by respondent no.3 the decision of respondent no.1;"
3. The petitioner is Agriculture Produce Market Committee ["APMC" for short] and is aggrieved by action of the respondents of cancelling/withdrawing the subsidy granted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.