Harsha Devani, J.

By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks the following substantive relief’s:

9. Therefore petitioner prays as under:-

(a) That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to admit and allow this petition.

(b) That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ of quo warranto and/or appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of writ of quo warranto and further be pleased to hold that appointment of sixth respondent is of ineligible/disqualified candidate contrary to statutory provisions of S.P. University Act, 1955 and norms and regulations of UGC and hence bad in law and therefore requires to be quashed and set aside and further to be pleased to quash and set aside the appointment of sixth respondent as V.C. of respondent university.

(c) That this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ of prohibition and/or appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of writ of prohibition restraining sixth respondent permanently to function as V.C. of respondent university.

2. The facts as averred in the petition are that the appointment of the Vice Chancellor of the third respondent Sardar Patel Universit