J.B.PARDIWALA
Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation – Respondent
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
1. By this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the applicant - original accused calls in question the legality and validity of the order dated 7th April, 2018 passed by the Special Judge (CBI), Court No.1, Ahmedabad, below Exh.1 in the Special (CBI) Sessions Cases Nos. 2 of 2014, 1 of 2014 and 3 of 2014.
2. By the impugned order referred to above, the learned Special Judge thought fit to exercise suo motu powers under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to summon and examine a responsible officer of the department of RTO, Junagadh, with directions to such officer to remain present before the court with necessary documents.
3. The learned Special Judge also thought fit to exercise its suo motu power under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to re-examine few other witnesses as, in the opinion of the learned Special Judge, their re-examination is necessary for the just decision of the case.
4. The facts giving rise to this application may be stated as under :
4.1. One, Amit Jethwa, stated to be an activist, who w
Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat
Hoffman Andreas v. Inspector of Customs, Amritsar
Kalyani Baskar (Mrs.) v. M.S. Sampoornam (Mrs.)
Mohanlal Shamji Soni v. Union of India and another
Raj Deo Sharma (II) v. State of Bihar
Rajaram Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar and another
Sudevanand v. State through C.B.I.
U.T. of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Anr. v. Fatehsinh Mohansinh Chauhan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.