SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Guj) 1150

J.B.PARDIWALA
Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.V. Raju, Adv., Niral R Mehta, Adv., Moxa Thakkar, Adv., R.C. Kodekar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

J.B. PARDIWALA, J.

1. By this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the applicant - original accused calls in question the legality and validity of the order dated 7th April, 2018 passed by the Special Judge (CBI), Court No.1, Ahmedabad, below Exh.1 in the Special (CBI) Sessions Cases Nos. 2 of 2014, 1 of 2014 and 3 of 2014.

2. By the impugned order referred to above, the learned Special Judge thought fit to exercise suo motu powers under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to summon and examine a responsible officer of the department of RTO, Junagadh, with directions to such officer to remain present before the court with necessary documents.

3. The learned Special Judge also thought fit to exercise its suo motu power under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to re-examine few other witnesses as, in the opinion of the learned Special Judge, their re-examination is necessary for the just decision of the case.

4. The facts giving rise to this application may be stated as under :

4.1. One, Amit Jethwa, stated to be an activist, who w












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top