S.H.VORA
MAHESHKUMAR RAVIDAN MOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
S H VORA, J.
1. Admit. Learned APP Ms. CM Shah waives service of notice of admission for the respondent State and learned advocate Ms. Bhoomi Thakore waives service of notice of admission for respondent No.2 - original complainant.
2. Vide order dated 31.12.2018, the learned Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar rejected the application of the appellant being Criminal Misc. Application No.2036 of 2018 filed u/s 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to enlarge the appellant on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest on account of offence being registered vide I C.R. No.55 of 2018 for the offences punishable u/s 324, 326, 506(2), 114, 120B, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and also u/s 3(2)(5) and 3(2) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989 (for short "SC/ST Act").
3. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the appellant preferred said appeal u/s 14A of the SC/ST Act.
4. Brief facts as stated in the FIR in sum and substance are like this:-
4.1 The complainant is a social worker and having post of President of Stall Union of Gandhinagar. The complainant is having Auto Garage, namely, Brahmadi situated at Sector 22 near G-6 and owns an
Gorige Pentaiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others reported in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.