SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Guj) 174

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B. PARDIWALA, A.C. RAO., JJ.
Rameshbhai Babubhai Thakor - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
R/Criminal Appeal No. 1467 of 2018
Decided On : 18-04-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Yogendra Thakore
For the Respondent: Mr. Himanshu Patel App.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Sections 173,228(2), 313, 374, 428 – Penal Code, Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 – Evidence Act, 1872 – Sections 25, 26 & 27 – Appeal against Conviction – Trial court convicted the appellants – Questioning legality and validity of judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge – Conviction contrary to provisions of law and against evidence on record and same required to be quashed and set aside – Held, Trial court has relied discovery panchnama and without taking proper care to record deposition of witness – Trial Court should bear in mind that mere proof of panchanama as document itself not sufficient and contents of panchanama viz. statements of accused under section 27 of Act, 1872 must be proved and brought on record by witnesses in their oral testimony – The trial court should not permit summary of evidence of witnesses to go on record in so far as oral evidence is in respect of section 27 of this Act – Prosecution failed to prove the guilt of appellants – Appeal allowed (Paras 5 to 6)

Facts of the case:

Trial court convicted the appellants – Questioning legality and validity of judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge – Conviction contrary to provisions of law and against evidence on record and same required to be quashed and set aside

Findings of the court:

Trial court has relied discovery panchnama and without taking proper care to record deposition of witness – Trial Court should bear in mind that mere proof of panchanama as document itself not sufficient and contents of panchanama viz. statements of accused under section 27 of Act, 1872 must be proved and brought on record by witnesses in their oral testimony – The trial court should not permit summary of evidence of witnesses to go on record in so far as oral evidence is in respect of section 27 of this Act – Prosecution failed to prove the guilt of appellants.

Result: Appeal allowed

JUDGMENT :

A.C. RAO., J.

1. The appellants – original accused Nos. 1 and 3 have preferred this Criminal Appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “the Cr.P.C.”), questioning the legality and validity of the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 26th July, 2018 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Banaskantha at Diyodar, in the Sessions Case No.3 of 2017. The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge convicted the appellants herein - original accused Nos. 1 and 3 for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “the IPC”) and sentenced them to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/- each, and in default of fine, directed to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of three months. The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge was pleased to grant benefit of set off as per Section 428 of the Cr.P.C.

2. The case of the prosecution, in nut shell is that, on 9th October, 2016, the complainant namely, Khodabhai Raymalbhai Thakor came to know that a dead body, was lying near the agricultural field of one Devanbhai Madhabhai Patel wrapped in a plastic bag. When he opened the plastic bag, he found a nude dead body cut into pieces. Therefore, he informed the police and a complaint was registered at the Bhabhar Police Station vide I-C.R. No.76 of 2016.

2.1 After the registration of the FIR, the Investigating Officer carried out the investigation and prepared the panchnama of the place of offence, collected evidence from the place of offence, recovery panchnama and inquest panchnama were prepared. He also collected muddamal and send muddamal to the FSL, collected FSL report and serological report. He recorded statements of the witnesses and carried out other investigation. The Investigating Officer found that the present appellants – original accused Nos. 1 and 3 and one another co-accused – original accused No.2 – Arvindbhai Vanabhai Chauhan, were the authors of the crime and they had disposed of the dead body of one Bhaveshbhai Rajabhai Thakor. It is alleged that the deceased – Bhaveshbhai had an evil-eye on the appellant No.2 – Sonlben Thakor and therefore, the appellant No.1 – Rameshbhai Thakor being the husband of the appellant No.2, killed the deceased and disposed of the dead body with the help of the co-accused. The dead body was cut into pieces and was thrown between Chaladar and Mespura village and thereby as alleged they tried to destroy the evidence.

2.3 On completion of the investigation, the Investigating Officer filed charge-sheet against the accused persons under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C. in the competent court of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhabhar and the case was registered as Criminal Case.

2.4 Since the case was triable by the court of Sessions, the Judicial Magistrate after providing copies of the charge-sheet papers to the accused free of costs, committed the case to the Sessions Court under Section 209 of the Cr.P.C. as the offence was triable by the court of Sessions and the case was re-registered as Sessions Case No.3 of 2017 in the court of Sessions Judge, Diyodar.

2.5 Thereafter, the Sessions Court framed charge under Section 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the IPC against the accused at Exh.5. The Sessions court also recorded plea of the accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 under Section 228(2) of the Cr.P.C. at Exh.6, 7 and 8. The accused pleaded not guilty and prayed for trial. Therefore, the Sessions Judge conducted the trial in accordance with law.

2.6 The prosecution produced following oral as well as documentary evidence :

ORAL EVIDENCE : -

Sr. no.

Details

Exhibit No.

1

Khodabhai Raimalbhai Thakor - Complainant

11

2

Dineshbhai Nagjibhai Prajapati - Panch-Witness of the Panchnama (Exhibit-15) of the scene of offence

14

3

Karsanbhai Ajmalbhai Prajapati- Panch-Wi




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top