SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Guj) 283

R.M.CHHAYA, S.H.VORA
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ramdas Madanlal Saini – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.C. Mazmudar, Adv., H.G. Mazmudar, Adv., H.M. Parikh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

S.H. Vora, J.

Learned advocate for the appellant seeks permission to delete respondent No.3 in First Appeal No.2138 of 2007 and respondent No.6 in First Appeal No.3150 of 2010. Permission is granted.

2. Present First Appeal No.2138 of 2007 under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') is at the instance of appellant - original opponent No.2 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Cross Objection No.79 of 2008 under the provisions of Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure is at the instance of original claimants of MACP No.1348 of 1998 whereby the parents of the deceased - Rajeshbhai Paul Saini have preferred Cross Objection against the judgment and award dated 07.08.2006 passed by the learned MACT (Auxi.), F.T. Court No.3, Kheda at Nadiad, thereby allowing the claim petition in part and awarded sum of Rs.13,97,000/- against original opponents along with proportionate cost and interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the amount is deposited with the Tribunal. Similarly, the appellant of First Appeal No.3150 of 2010 has challenged the award passed by the learned MACT (Main), Kheda at Nadiad thereby allowing











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top