IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B. PARDIWALA, A.C. RAO, JJ.
Arvindbhai Kiranbhai Bariya - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 245 of 2019
Decided On : 19-03-2019
Criminal Law – Criminal Trial – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 374 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302 read with section 201 – Gujarat Police Act – Section 135 – Offence of Murder – Appeal against conviction – Challenged – Complainant found dead-body of deceased - his brother lying in field near an electric poll at outskirts of village – He accordingly informed police – Postmortem revealed that deceased died due to internal head injury – It is pertinent to note that before incident, the deceased had informed complainant -his brother that his mobile was missing. On inquiry, appellant is alleged to have confessed before complainant that he had an altercation with deceased as regards mobile – Deceased had slapped the appellant on his face – Held, on perusal of the evidence on record, we are of the opinion that the conviction of any of the accused was not possible, consequently, impugned judgment and order of conviction convicting the appellant herein for the offence punishable under sections 302 r.w.s. 120(B) and 114 of IPC and imposing sentence of life imprisonment cannot sustain and we are of the view that if the punishment of the appellant - accused No.1 of life imprisonment is reduced to the period already undergone, ends of justice would be met – It is pertinent to note that the trial court has also convicted the original accused No.2 for the offence punishable under section 201 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years with fine of Rs.2000/- and in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months – However, the accused No.2 is not before this Court – though the original accused No.2 is not before this Court, when we reached at the conclusion that no conviction of accused was possible under section 302 of the IPC, the benefit of that decision must be extended to the similarly situated co-accused, even though he has not challenged the judgment and order of conviction and sentence by way of an appeal – impugned judgment and order of conviction modified – Appeal is partly allowed. (Paras 6 and 7)
A.C. RAO, J.
1. The appellant -original accused No.1 has preferred this Criminal Appeal under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the 6th (Ad-hoc) Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals at Godhara in Sessions Case No.59 of 2016 dated 16/11/2018, by which the Sessions Judge convicted the appellant -original accused No.1 for the offence punishable under sections 302 read with section 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under section 135 of Gujarat Police Act.
While convicting the appellant accused No.1, the trial court imposed the following sentence :-
For the offence punishable under section 302 of Indian Penal Code, the Sessions Judge sentenced the appellant - accused No.1 to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to make payment of fine, directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.
For the offence punishable under section 201 of Indian Penal Code, the Sessions Judge sentenced the appellant - accused No.1 to undergo imprisonment for a period of five years with fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default to make payment of fine, directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months.
For the offence punishable under section 135 of Gujarat Police Act, the Sessions Judge sentenced the appellant - accused No.1 to undergo imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs.500/- and in default to make payment of fine, directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months.
The Sessions Judge also granted benefit of set off as per section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2. Case of the prosecution :-
The complainant found the dead-body of the deceased - his brother lying in the field near an electric poll at the outskirts of the village. He accordingly informed the police. The postmortem revealed that the deceased died due to internal head injury. It is pertinent to note that before the incident, the deceased had informed the complainant -his brother that his mobile was missing. On inquiry, the appellant is alleged to have confessed before the complainant that he had an altercation with the deceased as regards mobile. The deceased had slapped the appellant on his face and therefore, the appellant got provoked and in the heat of moment, hit one blow with a wooden log on the head of the deceased. The deceased succumbed to the injuries. The appellant herein with the aid of the accused No.2 threw away the dead-body of the deceased somewhere at the outskirts of the village. The FIR being CR No.90 of 2016 came to be registered with the Morvah(H) Police Station for the offence punishable under section 302 read with section 114 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 135 of Gujarat Police Act.
2.01. Thereafter, during the course of the investigation, the investigating officer arrested the accused, recorded statements of the witnesses, prepared inquest punchnama, got postmortem report of the deceased, prepared panchnama of the place of offence and carried out other investigation. After completion of investigation, the investigating officer filed charge-sheet under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the competent court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class Morvah(H) for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201 read with section 114 of IPC and under section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act, and the case was registered as Criminal Case No.134 of 2016.
2.02. Since the case was triable by the Court of Sessions, the Judicial Magistrate after providing copies of the Charge-sheet papers to the accused, committed the case to the Sessions Court under section 209 of the Cr.P.C. and the case was re-registered as Sessions Case No.59 of 2016 in the Court of Sessions Judge Panchmahals at Godhara.
2.03. The Sessions Court framed Charge against t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.