SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Guj) 315

B.N.KARIA
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
AMINABEN BHIKHUBHAI – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR PALAK H THAKKAR
For the Respondent: MR AMAR D MITHANI

JUDGMENT :

1. Present appellant, being original opponent no.2 in W.C. (F) Case No.32 of 2006 before the learned Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, Junagadh, has challenged the judgment and award passed in aforesaid case dated 12.04.2007 by preferring this appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (in short ‘the Act’).

2. The short facts of the present case are as under:

2.1 As per the averments of the applicants in their petition before the learned Commissioner, the deceased-Bhikhubhai Abubhai was serving as driver with the opponent no.1 since last two years and was getting salary and allowances of Rs.4000/- per month. That, he was a driver of rickshaw, bearing registration No.GJ-1-XX-3124. That, there was relationship of the deceased with opponent no.1 as employee and employer. That, the insurance of the rickshaw, owned by the opponent no.1, was insured with the opponent no.2. That, on 30.03.2006, the deceased-Bhikhubhai was on duty, at about 10.30 a.m. in the morning, he was coming from Dolatpura – Junagadh railway station, at that time, just opposite to Majevdi Police Chawki, rickshaw, bearing registration no.GJ-1-XX-3124, driven by the deceased, suddenly, a













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top