J.B.PARDIWALA
Ghanchi Mohammad Husain Akbarbhai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs;
“(A) Be pleased to admit this petition;
(B) Be pleased to issue writ or certiorari or any other writ, order of direction, declaring the purported exercise of the Sue-Motu revisional powers u/s.211 vide notice dated 19.01.1988 to have vitiated from the very inception on account of attendant circumstances and consequent order passed by the Collector, Surendranagar in Revision Case No.4/1997-1998 and further order dated 24.06.2011 passed by the Revenue Tribunal in Revision Application No.T.E.N/A.A./26/1998 be quashed and set aside in view of peculiar facts of the present case.
(BB) Be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the Order dated 16.05.1998 passed by Respondent No.3 Collector, Surendranagar granting the land in question in favour of Respondent No.2 and further Order dated 29.05.1998 passed by SSRD, Revenue Department, State of Gujarat confirming the order dated 16.05.1998 which are at Annexure-”AA” (Colly).,
(C ) Be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned orders pa
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Gurnam Kaur reported in
State of U.P. and Ors. Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and Ors.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur
Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Deo Vs. State of Bihar
Purbanchal Cables and Conductors Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Assam State Electricity Board and Ors.
Gopalji Kanna v. Allahabad Bank
Mysore State Road Transport Corporation v. Mirja Khasim Ali Beg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.