VIPUL M.PANCHOLI
Sunil Nagendra Tivari – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Having heard learned advocates for the parties and considering the averments made in the note for speaking to minutes, the same is allowed. Therefore in the order dated 08.04.2019 passed in an application for anticipatory bail, following condition shall be shown,
“(g) the applicant and the company in which the applicant is working shall abide by the terms and conditions of the agreement entered into between the parties.”
Registry is directed to carry out necessary correction and issue fresh writ accordingly. Direct service is permitted.
ORDER :
Considering the averments made in the application, it is revealed that instead of anticipatory bail order, the order reflects about the regular bail. Therefore, the present note for speaking to minutes stands allowed. The order dated 02.04.2019 should be now read as under,
“1. By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant-accused has prayed for anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. I–24/2019 registered with Ankleshwar Rural Police Station, Bharuch for the offenses punishable under Sections 304 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Learned advocate for the appl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.