SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Guj) 1181

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R.P. DHOLARIA, J.
State of Gujarat - Appellant
Vs.
I.B. Vyas - Respondent
R/Criminal Revision Application No. 1088 of 2018
Decided On : 11-09-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mitesh Amin, Public Prosecutor assisted by L.B. Dabhi, A.P.P.
For the Respondents: Juned Bula and Nigam R. Shukla.

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Sections 397 and 401 – Incident of planting opium at Lajvant Hotel at Palanpur is deep rooted conspiracy wherein clear involvement of respondents and others is clearly emerging out and therefore for unearthing deep rooted conspiracy, special team came to be constituted by order of this Court at behest of respondents themselves – In that view of the matter, custodial interrogation is required to be carried out by handing over police custody during course of investigation – Application allowed and Magistrate concerned directed to hand over custody of present respondents accused commencing from 12.9.2018 at 10.00 morning for about 10 days i.e. upto 21.9.2018 till 5.00 p.m. and thereafter on completion of remand period, Magistrate shall secure the presence of present respondents accused for handing over to judicial custody in accordance with law. (Paras 15 to 18)

JUDGMENT :

R.P. Dholaria, J.

1. This Criminal Revision Application has been filed under section 397 read with section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 for the following main relief.

"(A) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 6.9.2018 passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Palanpur wherein remand application preferred by the petitioner for taking respondents No. 1 and 2 on police remand in the matter of Palanpur City Police Station C.R. No. 216 of 1996 and may be pleased to kindly grant the remand application preferred by the petitioner."

2. The facts of the present case are that C.R. No. 216 of 1996 of Palanpur Police Station, State of Gujarat, for the offence under Section 17 of the NDPS Act came to be registered on a telephonic message on 30.4.1996 from the police control room, Palanpur, which contains the message that one unknown person from Pali (Rajasthan) has given information that one Sumersingh C. Rajpurohit deals in opium. He is staying in Hotel Lajwanti at Palanpur, along with the opium weighing 5 kgs., delivery of the opium is to be given in Palanpur. On receiving this information, the police visited Hotel Lajwanti at Palanpur. Thereupon the hotel owner verified the entries of the register regarding the person holding the guest house. It was disclosed that as per entry No. 604 of the register, one Sumersingh Rajpurohit, resident of Vardhman Market, Pali, had checked in room No. 305 at 21:40 hours on 29.4.1996. The said room was given to him by his father Shantilal. Thereafter, the police team went to room No. 305 and opened the same. No person was found therein. It was learnt that on receiving the information about the raid, the occupant of the room had run away. Thereafter, search of the room was made in presence of Panchas. They found opium weighing 1 kg. 15 gms. The P.I. Mr. Vyas, under the instructions of Mr. Sanjiv Bhatt, D.S.P., Palanpur, went to Pali along with P.S.I., Rajendra Yagnik and other police constables. The accused Sumersingh was arrested in the intervening night of 2.5.1996 and 3.5.1996 from his house at Pali and brought to Palanpur. As per the information, he had come to Palanpur with 5 Kgs. Of opium and 1 kg. 15 gms. was recovered from room No. 305 of Hotel Lajwanti. Further information was to be collected from the accused as to where he sold the remaining 4 kgs. of opium. Sumersingh was produced before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palanpur, on 4.5.1996 and prayed for grant of remand for 14 days. When Sumersingh was produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the learned advocate on behalf of Sumersingh submitted that the accused is an advocate practising at Pali in the State of Rajasthan and he has been falsely arrested at the instance of the owner of the shop, which is in the possession of Sumersingh. It was also pointed out that a civil suit is going on between the owner of the shop and Sumersingh. It was also pointed out that the police is in collusion with the owner of the shop. However, the learned Magistrate granted remand for a period of seven days and directed that the accused shall be produced at 15:30 hours on 10.5.1996 before the Special Judge. 5th May was a holiday and on 6th an identification parade was arranged before the Executive Magistrate, Palanpur, at 16:30 hours. Sumersingh was not identified. The witnesses stated that the accused is not the person who checked in room No. 305 on 29th April 1996. They had not seen the arrested person-Sumersingh earlier. In view of this, on the same day, the police submitted a report before the Special Judge, Palanpur, under Section 169 of the Code and prayed that Sumersingh be released. Mr. R.P. Vaghela, the Additional Sessions Judge did not pass any order thereon on 6th May 1996. On the same day, the accused also filed an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code. The learned Additio














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top