SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.B.PARDIWALA
Akash Shakarabhai Sengal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Girish Patel Assoc, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Praikh, Asst. Government Pleader.

JUDGMENT :

J.B. Pardiwala, J.

By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs;

"(A) declaring the decision of the respondent authorities to reject the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment as absolutely unconstitutional, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and the rules of compassionate appointment of 2000, illegal, null and void and quashing the same;

(B) directing the respondent to give appointment to the petitioner with all the benefits attached to the post with effect from the date on which decision was taken to offer appointment with all incidental benefits and

(C ) passing any other appropriate order.

23. The petitioner, therefore, prays that during the pendency and till the final disposal of this petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to grant interim relief:-

(i) directing the respondents to give ad hoc appointment to the petitioner with all the benefits and

(ii) passing any other appropriate order."

2. It appears from the materials on record that the father of the writ applicant was serving as a Packer cum Coolie in the office of the respondent














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top