1. Rule. Respondent waives service.

2. The two petitions are instituted by wife. She has made grievance against the rejection of the amendment in Family Suit No.842 of 2005 in the Family Court, Ahmedabad. By amendment application, the figure of Rs.20,000/- was sought to be raised to Rs.60,000/-. The amendment was declined on various grounds; including the ground that the petitioner had a remedy under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (For short “the Cr.P.C.”).

3. The application for interim relief was moved in the Family Suit No.1086 of 2008 in the Family Court, Ahmedabad; the following findings were rendered on the interim application:

“9. Under the circumstances, to decide this application, it is required to taken into consideration the various orders passed in the other litigations from time to time by the concerned Court awarding the maintenance to the wife. Respondent-wife had filed Family Suit No.842 of 2005 under Section 18 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act for obtaining maintenance for herself and her 2 minor children, wherein this Court has awarded Rs.16,000/- per month as interim maintenance for herself and her 2 children to be paid by petitioner fr