SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIPUL M.PANCHOLI
Rutul Atulkumar Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Hardik C Rawal, Mrs. MH Rawal, Ms. Niketa R Vaidya
For the Respondent: Kshitij M Amin

ORDER :

1. By way of this petition which is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed that the respondent authority be directed to issue/renew the passport of the petitioner for a period of five/ten years, pursuant to the application dated 5.2.2019.

2. Heard learned advocate Mr.Rawal for the petitioner and learned Central Government Standing Counsel Mr.Amin for the respondent authority.

3. Learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that the respondent authority issued the passport in favour of the petitioner bearing no.K6051058. The said passport was issued on 20.7.2012 which was valid upto 19.7.2022. It is submitted that in the year 2016, the petitioner became the victim of fraud perpetrated by one Mr.Raj Vasudev Gurnani and others who promised the petitioner a permanent job in Canada after training at Bangalore. It is submitted that the FIR is registered against the said person i.e. Mr.Raj Gurnani. In the said criminal proceedings, the petitioner is shown as one of the witnesses. However, when the passport of the petitioner was found with the said accused, the said passport was seized by the investigation agency. It is submitted that the peti








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top