J.B.PARDIWALA, BHARGAV D.KARIA
Enprocon Enterprise Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of State Tax – Respondent
ORDER :
J.B.PARDIWALA, J.
1. By this Writ Application, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
(B) Your Lordship may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents inter alia directing the respondents to return the seized material back to the applicant, in the interest of justice;
(C) Your Lordship may be pleased to further quash and set aside the provisional attachment orders at Annexure ‘A’ (Colly) issued purportedly u/s. 83 of the CGST Act, 2017, in connection with the bank accounts of the applic
Barium Chemicals Ltd. vs. Company Law Board AIR 1967 SC 295
Bhikhubhai Vithlabhai Patel and others vs. State of Gujarat AIR 2008 SC 1771
ITO Calcutta vs. Lakhmani Mewal Das reported in (1976) 103 ITR 437 (SC)
J. Jayalalitha vs. U.O.I. AIR 1999 SC 1912
Smt. S.R. Venkatraman vs. Union of India reported in (1979) I LLJ 25
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.