SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Guj) 683

BANKIM N.MEHTA
Usmangani Yusufbhai Rangpariya – Appellant
Versus
Kishore B. Pawar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Parthiv B. Shah, Advocate.
For the Opponent :Mukesh B. Dave, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

The appellant - original complainant has filed this appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and challenged the impugned judgment and order of acquittal passed by learned Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara, on 14.5.2010 in Criminal Case No. 14285 of 2007 acquitting the respondent-accused for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ("the Act" for short).

2. According to the appellant, respondent was his friend as both of them were serving in Indian Penal Code-L. On account of friendship, the respondent used to obtain hand loan from time to time from him and used to return the amount so obtained. The respondent was in need of finance and therefor contacted him on 18.10.2006 and demanded Rs. 2,55,000/- as hand loan. He, with a view to help the respondent, gave Rs. 2,55,000/- in cash on 18.10.2006 to the respondent who received the amount and gave assurance that he would repay the amount within six to seven months. The respondent gave cheque No. 023921 drawn on Panchmahal Vadodara Gramin Bank dated 8.5.2007 for Rs. 2,55,000/- and assured that the cheque would be cleared. The cheque was p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top