J.M.SHETH
Vanitaben Bhaishanker Pandya – Appellant
Versus
Jayantilal Purshottam Upadhayay – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.M. SHETH, J.
1. This revision petition is filed by the petitioner-wife against the opponent-husband against the order passed by the learned District Judge, Rajkot, dated 1-4-1975, below Ext. 19 in Civil Appeal No. 55 of 1973, refusing to stay the appeal filed by the present petitioner against the opponent-husband against the decree passed by the trial Court granting divorce till the opponent complies with the order passed by the Court in application, Ext. 5, filed by the wife under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (which will be hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), claiming interim alimony and costs of the application. The court passed the said order on 27-9-1973, ordering the opponent-husband to pay to the wife Rs. 20/- per month from 27-6-1973 and to pay a further sum of Rs. 150/- as costs for the prosecution of the aforesaid appeal. It appears that the husband did not comply with that order and did not deposit any amount ordered by the Court. Therefore, the wife filed the aforesaid application, Ex. 19, requesting the Court to pass an order that the husband should immediately pay up to her the amount as ordered by the Court and if he fails to do so, the pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.