SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Guj) 381

B.N.KIRPAL
Kiritkumar Ramrai Jani – Appellant
Versus
Gangaram Gopalbhai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S.R. Shah, Advocate.
For the Respondent:P.K. Jani, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

B.N. Kirpal, J.

The challenge in this petition is to the order passed by the trial court requiring the petitioner/plaintiff to pay court fee on the basis of Rs. 40,000/-.

2. The plaintiff had filed the suit inter alia alleging that he had purchased plot No. 3 in S. No. 92 for Rs. 3,000/- by registered deed dated 9.11.1976 from one Virendrakumar Mobjibhai through his guardian, Manjibhai Nathubhai. Said Virendrakumar had, through his said guardian, purchased the aforesaid plot from the original owners, Patel Naranbhai Shivram and Kanjibhai Budhabhai, on 27.10.1976. The said lands had been divided into 10 plots and one of the plots had been purchased by the petitioner/plaintiff. It was further alleged in the plaint that the respondent purported to have purchased this very land from the original owner and he was trying to disturb the plaintiff's possession and some bricks also have been thrown on the land in question. Permanent injunction was prayed for by the petitioner against the respondent.

3. The case of the respondent before the trial court was that he had purchased the property in question for Rs. 40,000/-. The trial court came to the conclusion that the plaintiff, in eff

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top