JUDGMENT :

Ravi R. Tripathi, J.

The present LPA is filed by the Gujarat Maritime Board and others being aggrieved by judgment and order dated 3.12.2001 passed by this Court in SCA No.1375 of 1988.

2. The learned advocate for the appellants vehemently submitted that the Court ought not have taken upon itself the task of ordering regularisation of service of the opponent/original petitioner on the post of Clerk-cum-Typist more particularly with effect from 11.3.1997 because there is subsisting policy of giving benefits of regularisation, followed by the Board. The learned advocate for the appellants vehemently submitted that this order causes injustice to ten other employees who, according to the learned advocate for the appellants, are similarly situated.

At the outset we must reject this contention of the learned advocate for the appellants. If at all any individual is aggrieved by a judgment and order of this Court, he can always come to the Court either in the same proceeding or by filing substantive proceeding. In the present case, no individual has complained about any injustice to this Court. It is only the Gujarat Maritime Board - the appellant who has chosen to be busy with the