JUDGMENT :

R.R. Jain, J.

Petitioner/plaintiff which is a registered partnership firm, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 86 of 1986 in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.) at Junagadh, for monetary decree. It appears that till the evidence of plaintiff was over the registration certificate, i.e., extract from the Register of Firms, was not produced. However, when the same was found, a copy was produced vide Ex. 28. The Court permitted production of the document on condition of payment of cost and on condition of production of original. While allowing production it was also observed that so far as question of exhibiting the document is concerned, would be considered after production of original. It is in this background that the petitioner/plaintiff produced original document along with application Ex. 29 with a further request to recall the plaintiffs witnesses to prove the document. The application Ex. 29 was rejected. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner/plaintiff has preferred this revision application.

2. It is true that parties to the suit are required to produce all the documents before settlement of issues as provided under Order 13 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. But, at the s