SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 845

AKIL KURESHI
Sushila M. Racca – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Shikshan Mandal High School – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Maya S. Desai, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. N.D. Gohil, AGP.

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Akil Kureshi, J.

The petitioner who is a retired lady-teacher had to approach this Court second time to seek full retiral benefits. Earlier, the petitioner had filed Civil Application No.9434 of 1996 seeking pension and other retiral benefits which were not paid to her on account of the attitude on the part of the school authorities. The said Special Civil Application No.9434 of 1996 came to be disposed of by this Court by giving following directions:

    "7. Petition is, therefore, allowed. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, following directions are issued:

(a) The respondent No.1 is directed to forward the details submitted by the petitioner regarding the service rendered by her in the State of Maharashtra to the office of the respondent No.2 within a period of seven days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

(b) The respondent No.2, on receipt of the aforesaid papers, shall process the same and make necessary orders in accordance with law within 15 days from the date of the receipt of such papers.

(c) The respondent No.4 shall make the necessary orders of revision of pension, if any, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top