SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 682

D.G.KARIA
Chandanbhai Chhotabhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
Babubhai Marghabhai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Vasuben. P. Shah, Advocate.
For the RespondentS:M.A. Bukhari, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. The applicants are the heirs and legal representatives of deceased, Chandubhai Chhotabhai Patel, who was the respondent No.1 in Special Civil Application No.123/85. The said Special Civil Application No.123/85 was heard and judgment was delivered in it on 17.8.1993. Respondent No.1, Chandulal Chhotabhai Patel had died on 10.3.1989 at village Kanisa, Taluka Khambhat. Thus, when the aforesaid judgment came to be delivered, disposing of the Special Civil Application No.123 of 1985, the respondent No.1 Chandulal Chotabhai Patel, was already dead. The present Misc. Civil Application is filed for reviewing the said order dated 17th August, 1993 passed in Special Civil Application No.123 of 1985 and quashing it on the ground that the respondent No.1 had already died when the petition was heard and disposed of.

I have heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

2. Ms. V.P. Shah, learned Advocate appearing for the applicants, submitted that in view of the legal position as laid down in the case of Jadavji Devshanker v. Jiviben Lavji Rugnath, reported in (1977) 18 G.L.R. page 504, this application deserves to be allowed. In the above case of Jadavji Devshanker (supra),

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top