JUDGMENT :

K.M. Thaker, J.

Heard learned advocate Mr. T.K. Patel, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Alkesh N. Shah learned AGP for the respondent.

2. Rule. Learned AGP Mr. Alkesh N. Shah waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent state authority.

3. At the request of learned advocate for the petitioner and with consent of learned AGP, the petition is taken up for hearing and final decision today.

4. In present petition, the petitioner has prayed for below mentioned relief:

“6(B) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the order dated: 01/05/2012 passed by Chief controlling revenue authority in Stamp/Appeal/28/2012/2358;”

5. At the time of hearing, the petitioner requested for permission to amend the petition so as to amend paragraph No.6 and add request for further. The request was granted and the petitioner was permitted to amend the petition. Accordingly, paragraph No.6(F) has been added, which reads thus:

“6(F) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to condone the delay caused by present petitioner in preferring stamp/Appeal/28/2012/2358 before Chief Controlling Revenue Authority;”

6. The petitioner is aggrieved