A.Y.KOGJE
Executive Engineer (O & M) – Appellant
Versus
Amul Crankshaft Pvt. Ltd. Unit-2b – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. These two petitions are filed by the Electric Company challenging the order of the Chief Electrical Inspector and Appellate Authority, Gandhinagar in Appeal by which the bill issued by the petitioner company was set aside. In Special Civil Application No. 6553 of 2012, the order dated 06.02.2012 in Appeal No.MNV/Appeal/2126 of 2012 against bill of Rs.52,06,835/- is under challenge and in Special Civil Application No.11005 of 2012 the order dated 07.03.2013 passed by the same authority in Appeal No.MVN/TPS/235 of 2013 against the bill of Rs.31,89,311/- is under challenge. Both the petitions are based on similar facts and between the same parties however, the challenge is with regards to the bills issued for different period and therefore, the facts are extracted from Special Civil Application No.6553 of 2012.
2. Learned advocate Ms. Lilu Bhaya appearing for the petitioner submitted that the checking was carried out by the team of the petitioner on 26.08.2011 in the premises of respondent No.1 in the presence of representative of the respondent No.1. It was found that though the respondent No.1 had obtained connection for Part No.1, power supply to the extent of 340 H.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.