BIREN VAISHNAV
Chandanji Talaji Thakor – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION
Heard. In view of the averments made in the Civil Application, the applicant is permitted to be joined as party respondent no. 3 in the main writ petition. Civil Application is accordingly allowed.
ORDER IN SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION
1. Heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties. With consent of learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, petition is taken up for final hearing today.
2. By way of this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners - 3 in number have prayed for a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or direction for quashing and setting aside the notification dated 04.01.2021 of the respondent no. 2 University for election of two members in the Executive Council to be elected from amongst the members of the Court of the University.
3. The case of the petitioners is that Section 15 of the Hemachandracharya North Gujarat University Act (‘the Act’ for short) provides for authorities of the University which includes the Court, the Executive Council etc. The elections to the Executive Council for two members ought not to be held as the Court constituted under Section 16 of th
Bar Council of Delhi and Others vs. Surjeet Singh and Others [(1980) 4 SCC 211]
Mr. N.B Khare vs. Election Commission of India
In RE: Presidential Court (1974) 2 SCC 33
Narhari Amin vs. Gujarat University [2013(1) GLR 430]
Shaji K. Joesph vs. V. Viswanath and others [(2016) 4 SCC 429].
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.