SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 53

BHARGAV D.KARIA
Sattarbhai Adambhai Ghaniwala – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
KAUSHAL H. PATEL, MR SP MAJMUDAR, NANAVATI & CO., Adv.

ORDER :

Heard learned advocate Mr. Nishit Gandhi with learned advocate Mr. S.P. Majmudar for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Maulik Nanavati for Nanavati and Co for respondent nos. 2 and 3 through video conference.

1. By way of this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:

    “(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions quashing and set aside the impugned notice dated 12.06.2020 issued by the Town Planning Officer (at ANNEURE – F hereto) and further be pleased to direct the Town Planning Officer to show the name of the petitioner as the person who would be entitled for the land situated at Harni, TalDist. Vadodara being Original Plot No.89/1, Final Plot No.47 of Town Planning Scheme No.2 (Harni), Vadodara;

(B) During pendency and final disposal of the present application, YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to maintain statusquo with regard to the land in question;

(C) Pass and such other and/or further orders that may be thought just and proper, in the facts and circumstances of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top