IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B.PARDIWALA, ILESH J. VORA, JJ.
Heval Navinbhai Patel C/o Ketan H. Shah – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer Ward 3(2)(2) – Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 17557 of 2018 With R/Special Civil Application No. 18372 of 2018
Decided on : 01-02-2021
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 148 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Civil Application - Assessment - Writ applications are same and reasons assigned for reopening of assessment - Prayed to call for records of proceedings, look into them and be pleased to issue of writ certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing impugned 148 notice and objection order - Writ application is to notice issued by respondents for Assessment Year reasons assigned for reopening of assessment for relevant year - In this case, it is gathered by undersigned that undersigned is in possession of information that a search u/s. 132/Survey u/s. 133A of the I T Act, 1961, was carried out at the various premises of Venus Group - One of premises i.e. Crystal Arcade was covered u/s. 132 of I T Act, 1961 and documents related to unaccounted cash transactions of the Venus Group were seized. On analysis and co-relating of these documents, it was found that unaccounted cash transaction were first recorded on vouchers further these were recorded on the day cash-book –
Finding of the Court:
It cannot be said that there is total non-application of mind on part of Assessing Officer while recording reasons for reopening of assessment - It also cannot be said that his conclusion was merely based on some documents seized in course of search undertaken at the premises of Venus Group under Section 132 of the Act - Assessing Officer cannot be said to have merely concluded without verifying the fact that it is a case of reopening of assessment - it was found that unaccounted cash transactions were first recorded on the vouchers and thereafter in day cash book - Seized documents reflected unaccounted cash transactions for period cash book was written in coded form - Further details and documents were obtained from the office of Sub-Registrar for the purpose of identifying the beneficiaries in the transactions with the Venus Group –
Result: Writ application rejected
JUDGMENT :
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned writ applications are the same and the reasons assigned for the reopening of the assessment are also the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No. 17557 of 2018 is treated as the lead matter.
3. By way of this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:
(B) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction asking the respondent not to proceed further in pursuance of Section 148 notice at Annexure- A and objection order at Annexure - E.
(C) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this application, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to stay further proceedings in pursuance of section 148 notice at Annexure-A.
(D) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant any further or other relief as this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the interest of justice, and
(E) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to allow this application with costs against the respondent”
4. We may clarify at this stage that the writ applicant herein, namely Heval Navinbhai Patel is the unmarried daughter of the writ applicant of the connected writ application.
5. The subject matter of challenge in the present writ application is to the notice issued by the respondents under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act, 1961') for the Assessment Year 2012- 13. The reasons assigned for reopening of the assessment for the relevant year vide order 30.07.2018, reads thus:
“Reason for reopening of the assessment in the case of Shri Heval Navinbhai Patel A.Y. 2012-13 u/s 147 of the I T Act.”
In this case, it is gathered by the undersigned that: The undersigned is in the possession of information that a search u/s. 132/Survey u/s. 133A of the I T Act, 1961, was carried out at the various premises of Venus Group. One of the premises i.e. Crystal Arcade at C G road, Ahmedabad was covered u/s. 132 of the I T Act, 1961 and documents related to unaccounted cash transactions of the Venus Group were seized. On analysis and co-relating of these documents, it was found that unaccounted cash transaction were first recorded on vouchers further these were recorded on the day cash-book.
(2) Incriminating documents relating to unaccounted cash: The seized incriminating documents related to unaccounted cash transactions were from the period since January 2007 to 07 March 2015. The transactions were recorded in continuous manner i.e. without any gap and these transactions of unaccounted cash are related to Venus Group and Vaswani Family member. The cash book is written in coded from for name, amounts, dates and estimates etc. Further, the signature on seized unaccounted day cash-book by Shri Deepak Bhudharmal Vaswani/Ashok Sunderdas Vaswani proves about its verification and authenticity as these transaction entries were supported with supporting vouchers also.
(3) Supporting Vouchers: There are two different colours of vouchers i.e. Green and pink coluors. The green colour vouchers are the indicators of receipt of cash whereas pink colour vouchers indicate expenses/payments. Green colour envelopes contains details of land, survey no., name of broker and vouchers relating to persons(parties).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.