IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VIKRAM NATH, J.B.PARDIWALA, JJ.
ADITYA VIMALBHAI JIVRAJANI & others - Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & others - Respondent
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16026 of 2020
Decided On : 20-02-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 and Article 73 - Gujarat Epidemic Diseases, COVID-19 Regulations, 2020 - Epidemic Disease Act, 1897 - Sections 2, 3 and 4 - Specific Relief Act - Section 14 - Government of India Act, 1935 - Section 8 and 49 - PG Entrance Examination (NEET) - Bond Free Certificate - Terms of contract - Case of writ-applicants that they had executed a bond and solvency certificate and same was handed over to Dean of respective Government Medical College at time of their admission for M.B.B.S. Degree Course for the Academic Year 201415 – Seeks direction to Respondent No.1 or its delegates, officers, subordinates, NOT to enforce orders granting appointment to Petitioners i.e. orders
Finding of the court: The role of police will come into play once appropriate legal proceedings are initiated by concerned authority in accordance with law. If writ-applicants do not intend to render their services as called upon by virtue of the various orders, then what follows next are legal consequences of same. It is at that point of time that police may perhaps have to play its own role in accordance with law. Once again make a humble request to the writ-applicants to rise to occasion and render their services. Court do not intend to say that at cost of preparing themselves for the NEETPG Exam they should render their services. A balance can always be tilted in such a scenario. Some modalities can be worked out, by which the writ-applicants can render their services for a reasonable period of time, and at the same time, they can also prepare themselves for forthcoming NEETPG Exam.
Result: Writ-application and dispose of
JUDGMENT :
J.B.PARDIWALA, J.
1. By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs :
(B) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to the Respondent No.1 or its delegates, officers, subordinates, NOT to enforce orders granting appointment to Petitioners i.e. orders dated 24.07.2020, 10.11.2020, 20.11.2020, 22.11.2020, 25.11.2020, 27.11.2020, 29.11.2020 and 03.12.2020 at Annexures – 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F Colly', till NEETPG Entrance Exams are held in 2021;
(C) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus by issuing any appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, to quash and setaside orders dated 20.11.2020, 22.11.2020, 25.11.2020, 27.11.2020, 29.11.2020 and 03.12.2020 i.e. Annexures – 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F-Colly' passed by the Respondent No.1 granting appointment to the Petitioners and other similarly situated persons, as being without any authority of law;
(D) Pending admission, hearing and/or final disposal of this petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to stay the execution, operation and implementation of the orders dated 24.07.2020, 10.11.2020, 20.11.2020, 22.11.2020, 25.11.2020, 27.11.2020, 29.11.2020 and 03.12.2020 passed by the Respondent No.1 granting appointment to the Petitioners and other similarly situated persons till NEETPG Entrance Exams are held in 2021;
(E) Such other and further relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem just, fit and expedient be granted in favour of the petitioner.”
2. In this hour of crisis when the battle against the Covid-19 pandemic is still on, a batch of almost 307 doctors have once again disappointed this Court by saying that the Government should not ask them to render their services compulsorily at the Covid Hospitals as they all intend to prepare themselves for the forthcoming PG Entrance Examination (NEET) scheduled to be held some time in March 2021.
3. We would like to remind the writ applicants of what we observed in an identical litigation in the case of Patel Shreyaskumar Kamleshkumar vs. State of Gujarat (Special Civil Application No.9139 of 2020, decided on 19th August 2020). We quote the relevant observations thus :
In the universal record of 'good karma', the names of young aspiring do
Shri Sitaram Sugar Company Limited and another v. Union of India and others
Asif Hameed and others v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others
Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur and others v. The State of Punjab
Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan v. State of U.P.
Pt.Parmanand Katara v. Union of India and others
Akhil Bharatiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh v. Union of India MANU/SC/0058/1980 : (1981) 1 SCC 246
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.