VIPUL M.PANCHOLI
Ashokbhai Raisingbhai Parmar – Appellant
Versus
Abritrator, Kumari Neetaben V. Patel – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, in which, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.09.2020 passed below Exh.23 passed by respondent No.1 Arbitrator in Arbitration Case No.1 of 2020.
2. Heard learned advocate Ms.Tejal A. Vashi for learned advocate Mr. V.H. Desai for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr.Mrugen K. Purohit for respondent No.2.
3. Learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that respondent Nos.2 and 3 have formed a Partnership Firm on 01.08.2008 in the name and style of “Ronak Developers”. The said partnership firm is registered on 01.08.2008. Partnership Deed was executed. It is submitted that the said Partnership Deed provides that in case of any dispute or difference of opinion, which may raise between the parties, the dispute is required to be referred to the Arbitrator. It is submitted that the dispute or difference of opinion arose between respondent Nos.2 and 3 and therefore, respondent No.2 has invoked the arbitration clause and matter was referred to the concerned Arbitrator i.e. respondent No.1.
3.1 It is submitted the respondent No.2 filed a Statement of Claim. Thereafter, respondent No.2 submitted an
SBP & Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. And Anr. reported in (2005) 8 SCC 618
Imc Limited Vs. Board of Trusted of Deendayal Port Trust reported in 2019 (3) GLR 1798
SBP and Co. v. M/s.Patel Engineering Ltd. And Anr. reported in 2006(1) GLH 105
Cheran Properties ltd. Vs. Kasturi and sons Ltd and Ors reported in (2018) 16 SCC 413
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.