IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B.PARDIWALA, ILESH J. VORA, JJ.
AMI ORGANICS LIMITED - Petitioner
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - Respondent
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19545 of 2018
Decided On : 08-03-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143 (1), 147 and 148 - Whether impugned notice of reopening should be quashed - seeks to challenge impugned Notice issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2012-13, whereby, the assessment is sought to be reopened in exercise of powers under Section 147 of Act, 1961
Finding of the court: There is prima facie tangible material to form an opinion that the income has escaped assessment and the assessee failed to disclose truly and fully all primary facts at the time of the previous assessment, as a result, the assessing officer could not draw proper legal inferences with regard to the alleged transaction. Therefore, as at the relevant time, there was no formation of opinion with regard to the alleged transaction, assessing officer is not prohibited to form an opinion on the basis of tangible material that came in his hands by way of information. It cannot be said that, there was no tangible material before the assessing officer and that he proceeded mechanically based on the sole information and impugned notice is without jurisdiction and contrary to Section 147 of Act.
Result: Writ application dismissed
ORDER :
ILESH J. VORA, J.
1. By filing this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant seeks to challenge the impugned Notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) dated 01.03.2008 for the A.Y. 2012-13, whereby, the assessment is sought to be reopened in exercise of the powers under Section 147 of the Act, 1961.
2. The brief facts can be summarized as under:
2.2 Thereafter, the assessing officer reopened the assessment under Section 147 of the Act by issuing impugned notice dated 01.03.2018 under Section 148 of the Act.
2.3 At the request, the reasons recorded have been furnished to the assessee, which reads as under:-
“Brief details of the assessee
The assessee company is engaged in the business manufacturing of Pharmaceuticals Intermediates. The assessee filed its e-return of income on 27.09.2012 declaring total income of Rs.2,02,,52,860/-. The return was processed under Section 143(3) of the Act. The case was selected for scrutiny assessment and order under Section 143(3) of the Act was passed on 09.03.2015 determining total income at Rs.2,20,77,490/-.
Brief details of information received by this office :-
This office is in receipt of following information from the office of Asst. (Inv.) Unit-2(2), Mymbai:-”Enquiries have been conducted in the case of Shri Yogesh D. Waghela, Prop. Of M/s. Brown Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals, PAN AAWPW7911Q. It is seen that Shri Yogesh D. Waghela has not filed return of income for A.Y. 1011-12 & 2012-13.
Summons were issued to HDFC & ICICI Bank and statements of following accounts for F.Ys 2010-11 & 2011-15 were obtained:
Sr. No.Name of the Bank Account in the name of Account No.1HDFC Bank Brown Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals 4750500016352ICICI Bank Brown Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals 15805006609
On further perusal of account nos.00475050001635 & 015805006609 of the assessee held with HDFC Bank & ICICI Bank respectively, it is seen that credits & debits in the above bank accounts are as under:-
Bank account No.F.Y. 2010-11F.Y. 2011-12Credits (Rs.)Credits (Rs.)Debits (Rs.)HDFC Bank – 47505000163512,48,64,51412,30,04,96311,85,82,618 12,04,41,646ICICI Bank -158050066091,15,28,0511,15,39,051Account closed on 15.07.2010
It is pertinent to mention here M/s. Brown Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals is amongst the concerns which are declared as suspicious parties by Mahrashtra State VAT department.
Further, summons were issued to HDFC Bank & ICICI Bank to provide the details of credits and debit parties in the above bank statement and from the anaylysis of details received from the HDFC Bank & ICICI Bank and the list of beneficiaries to hawala operators received from sales Tax Department (Maharashtra) which is consolidated by the Directorate of investigation, Mumbai, it is observed that following entities reflecting in the bank statement are also reflecting in such hawala list either as beneficiaries or as Hawala Dealer:
Sr. No.Name of Beneficiary/hawala DealerPAN1SRS PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTDAAFCS4633P2TEJAK
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.