J.B.PARDIWALA, BHARGAV D.KARIA
AMRISHBHAI HASMUKHLAL PARIKH – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1)(3), AHMEDABAD – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B.PARDIWALA, J.
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Ms.Mauna Bhatt, the learned Standing Counsel, waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent.
2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
(b) pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, to stay implementation and operation of the notice at Annexure-’A’ to this petition and stay further proceedings for assessment for A.Y.2013-14;
(c) any other and further relief deemed just and proper be granted in the interest of justice;”
3. The facts giving rise to this Writ Application may be summarized as under:
(3.2) Thereafter, the case of the writ-applicant was selected for scrutiny assessment and notices dated 23.6.2015, 6.8.2015 and 18.8.2015 respectively under section 142(1) of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.