SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 364

A.P.THAKER
AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE – Appellant
Versus
MANSINGH KHADAKSING BHIST – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: MR GM AMIN
For the Respondent: DIPESH D CHHAYA, JEET Y RAJYAGURU

JUDGMENT :

1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned award dated 16.01.2015 passed by the Labour Court No.1, Rajkot in Reference (L.C.D.) No.12/2002, whereby the Labour Court has ordered to regularize the respondents within 30 days and to make them permanent as Class-IV employees.

2. It is the main contention of the petitioner that it is an Agriculture Produce Market Committee established under the Gujarat Agriculture Produce Market Act and Rules framed thereunder. It has referred to the facts of the case and has contended that the workmen (respondents no.1 to 3) are serving in the Marketing Committee only purely on temporary basis as Watchman (Chowkidar). The grievance of the workmen is that they should be made permanent and the benefits of 5th Pay Commission be extended to them and difference of arrears be paid to them. It is also contended that the workmen have filed an appeal before the Director of Agriculture Marketing and Rural Financing, State of Gujarat bearing Appeal No.28 to 30 of 2001 in which they have stated that three employees namely Suresh Vagasia, Raju Sakia and Ashwin Valan were m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top