IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R.M. Chhaya, R.P.Dholaria, JJ.
United India Insurance Company Ltd
Versus
Prabhaben W/o Kamleshbhai Solanki
R/First Appeal No. 6150 of 2019 & 12 of 2020
Decided On : 25-03-2021
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 - Claim of compensation - Awarded - Accident - Deceased were sports person and had gone in Kerala as competitors University to attend Inter-University Cycling Competition of national level - Record further indicates after having their dinner, competitors were returning with coach from Kariyavattam and walking on the road from Police Station - Record show time, a Maruti Zen car bearing registration being driven in rash and negligent manner, overrun competitors walking on the road - It further appears from the record that five students sustained serious injuries out of which one Vijay died on the spot while sustained serious injuries and other bodily injuries and were immediately taken to Medical College said student was operated - injuries sustained were so serious that ultimately, he succumbed to the same during treatment.
Finding of the court : Consortium is a special prism reflecting changing norms about the status and worth of actual relationships. Modern jurisdictions world-over have recognized that the value of a child’s consortium far exceeds the economic value of the compensation awarded in the case of the death of a child. Most jurisdictions therefore permit parents to be awarded compensation under loss of consortium on the death of a child. The amount awarded to the parents is a compensation for loss of the love, affection, care and companionship of the deceased child - Motor Vehicles Act is a beneficial legislation aimed at providing relief to the victims or their families, in cases of genuine claims. In case where a parent has lost their minor child, or unmarried son or daughter, the parents are entitled to be awarded loss of consortium under head of Filial Consortium. Parental Consortium is awarded to children who lose their parents in motor vehicle accidents under Act - we deem it appropriate to award the father and the sister of the deceased, an amount each for loss of Filial Consortium - MACP original claimants are parents and two sisters (?) and in claim petition original claimants are mother and two unmarried sisters. Following the ratio laid down by Apex Court in the binding decision of the Apex Court, the mother as well as the parents will be entitled to filial compensation as awarded by the Tribunal - respondents-original claimants of First Appeal arising out of MACP be entitled to total compensation Tribunal has awarded - Appellant-insurance company would be entitled to refund - Impugned award stands modified to the aforesaid extent and the appeal stands allowed partly - Tribunal shall refund the aforesaid amount with proportionate interest and cost.
Result : Ordered Accordingly
JUDGMENT :
R.M.CHHAYA, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied by the common judgment and award dated 02.05.2019, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Junagadh, in MACP Nos. 103 and 104 of 2014, the insurance company has preferred these appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).
2. Same set of evidence were produced before the Tribunal in both the claim petitions and both the claim petitions arise from the same accident and hence, both the appeals were directed to be heard together.
3. The following facts emerge from the record of these appeals –
3.2 In MACP No. 103/14, it was the case of the original claimants that the deceased Pratikraj Solanki was 20 years old and sportsman and had applied for various jobs and was pursuing his B.Com studies in fourth Semester in Commerce & Law College, Junagadh. It is also the case of the original claimants that he was working in Sakkarbaug Zoo and was earning Rs. 4,000/- p.m. In MACP No. 104/14, the original claimants contended that deceased Vijay Naranbhai was aged 18 years and was earning Rs. 4,000/- p.m.
In MACP No. 103/14, Prabhaben, mother of the deceased was examined at exhibit 20 and in MACP No. 104/14, Naranbhai, father of the deceased was examined at exhibit 63. The claimants also relied upon documentary evidence in both the claim petitions such as School Leaving Certificate of deceased Pratikraj at exhibit 23, death certificate at exhibit 24, ration card in the name of Prabhaben Solanki at exhibit 25, SSC marksheet of deceased Pratikraj at exhibit 26, SSC Certificate of Pratikraj at exhibit 27, HSC Marksheet of Pratikraj at exhibit 28, HSC Certificate of Pratikraj at exhibit 29, Marksheet of B.Com, Sem-I and II at exhibit 30 and 31, I-Card of Pratikraj at exhibit 32, I-Card of Pratikraj for physical education at exhibit 33, FIR at exhibit 34, copy of the C.R. No. 81/13 of Kazhakuttam Khalel at exhibits 51 and 52, HSC Certificate of Vijay at Exhibit 53, Marksheet of B.Com Sem-I of vijay N. Khalel at exhibit 54, I-Card of Vijay at exhibit 55, Postmortem Certificate of Vijay at Exhibit 56, Embalming Certificate of Vijay at Exhibit 57, Letter from the Registrar of University of Kerala regarding releasing of Embalmed body of vijay at exhibit 58, Certificate issued by the Kazhakuttam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.