A.P.THAKER
Pankaj Kamaliya – Appellant
Versus
DY Conservator of Forest – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned award dated 05.03.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Amreli in Reference (L.C.A.) No.8 of 2007 whereby instead of granting reinstatement with continuity of service with back wages, the Labour Court has granted lump sum amount of Rs.1,50,000/-, the petitioner – workman has preferred this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs.
[B] Be pleased to declare that termination of services of workman was illegal and therefore in light of the judgment of Hon. Supreme Court, respondents be directed to reinstate the petitioner in services.
[C] Pending admission and final disposal of this petition be pleased to direct respondents to take petitioner in serv
Tapash Paul Vs. BSNL and another reported in 2016 (1) Scale 92
BSNL Vs. Bhurumal reported in 2014 (7) SCC 177
Syed Yakoob v. K. S. Radhakrishnan
Prabhakar Vs. Joint Director, Sericulture Department and another
Harjinder Singh Vs. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation
Anoop Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1, Panipat (Haryana)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.