SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 427

A.S.SUPEHIA
KUNVERBEN MARKHIBHAI KARMUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR PREMAL S RACHH
For the Respondent: MS MOXA THAKKER, Appellant

ORDER :

1. Heard the learned advocates for the respective parties by video conferencing.

2. By way of the present applications filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants-accused have prayed for bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11202046210044 of 2021 registered with Jamnagar Panch 'B' Police Station, Dist.Jamnagar for the offences under Sections 4(2), 4(3), 5(a) and 5(c) of the Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020.

3. The case of the prosecution in brief is that, as per the F.I.R. well as charge-sheet, which is filed in the case of the co-accused is that the land bearing survey No.131 and 132 situated at village Dared, has been grabbed by the applicants. The contentions of the F.I.R. as well as the charge-sheet reveals that one – Vijaykumar Malani incorporated new Dared Non-trading Corporation (Scheduled) the and he had made a layout plan comprising of 179 sub-plots and handed over possession to the applicants by way of agreements to sale on different dates commencing from 2012.

4. Learned advocate for the applicants has submitted that there are more than 110 accused arraigned in the F.I.R. He has further submitted that the concerned la

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top