SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 443

A.S.SUPEHIA
ZAKIRMIYA HAYATMIYA SAIYAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : MR VAIBHAV A VYAS
For The Respondent: MR. JAY M THAKKAR, MR. H.K.PATEL

JUDGMENT :

1. On 11.12.2020, this Court, while recording the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the applicant in detail, and in light of the seriousness of the allegations made in the present application against the police officer, had issued directions to the Commissioner of Ahmedabad City as well as to the Assistant Commissioner of Police (Mahila Police Station) to file appropriate report with regard to the involvement of the Police Officers in the matter and also the complicity of the applicant in the offence.

2. As recorded in the order dated 14.06.2021, thereafter, comprehensive reports of both the afore-noted officers were ordered to be taken on record. This Court has perused the reports.

3. By way of the present application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), the applicant-accused has prayed for bail in connection with the FIR being C.R.No.11191024201414 of 2020 registered with Ramol Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences under Sections 354A(1)(i), 354B, 354D, 376(2)(n), 377, 108, 506(1), 294B and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).

4. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the prosecutrix is a 26 years of lady

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top