A.S.SUPEHIA
ZAKIRMIYA HAYATMIYA SAIYAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. On 11.12.2020, this Court, while recording the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the applicant in detail, and in light of the seriousness of the allegations made in the present application against the police officer, had issued directions to the Commissioner of Ahmedabad City as well as to the Assistant Commissioner of Police (Mahila Police Station) to file appropriate report with regard to the involvement of the Police Officers in the matter and also the complicity of the applicant in the offence.
2. As recorded in the order dated 14.06.2021, thereafter, comprehensive reports of both the afore-noted officers were ordered to be taken on record. This Court has perused the reports.
3. By way of the present application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), the applicant-accused has prayed for bail in connection with the FIR being C.R.No.11191024201414 of 2020 registered with Ramol Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences under Sections 354A(1)(i), 354B, 354D, 376(2)(n), 377, 108, 506(1), 294B and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).
4. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the prosecutrix is a 26 years of lady
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.