SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 391

ASHUTOSH J.SHASTRI
Maheta Umed Kumar Mansukhlal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR ASHISH M. DAGLI
For the Respondent: MR JK SHAH

JUDGMENT :

1. RULE. Rule is returnable forthwith. Mr. J.K. Shah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent – State. With the consent of both the learned advocates, the present criminal revision application is taken up for final hearing today itself.

2. By way of this Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the order passed below Exhibit-73 in Special Case No. 6 of 2019 dated 08.03.2021 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (City Civil Court No. 18).

3. The case of the petitioner is that on 08.04.2018, a complaint was lodged by one Shailendrasinh Raghuvansinh, Dy. S.P. CID (Crime), inter alia alleging that an application was received on 23.02.2018 from one Shailesh Babulal Bhatt, resident of Surat making accusation against LCB Police Inspector, Amreli and Police personnel to the effect that in a While Fortuner Car, he was abducted from Nidhi Petrol Pump along with his driver Mahipal and driver Kirit Paladiya. It is further alleged that near Keshav Farm situated at Dehgam Road, he was forcefully asked to stay

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top