ASHUTOSH J.SHASTRI
Maheta Umed Kumar Mansukhlal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. RULE. Rule is returnable forthwith. Mr. J.K. Shah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent – State. With the consent of both the learned advocates, the present criminal revision application is taken up for final hearing today itself.
2. By way of this Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the order passed below Exhibit-73 in Special Case No. 6 of 2019 dated 08.03.2021 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (City Civil Court No. 18).
3. The case of the petitioner is that on 08.04.2018, a complaint was lodged by one Shailendrasinh Raghuvansinh, Dy. S.P. CID (Crime), inter alia alleging that an application was received on 23.02.2018 from one Shailesh Babulal Bhatt, resident of Surat making accusation against LCB Police Inspector, Amreli and Police personnel to the effect that in a While Fortuner Car, he was abducted from Nidhi Petrol Pump along with his driver Mahipal and driver Kirit Paladiya. It is further alleged that near Keshav Farm situated at Dehgam Road, he was forcefully asked to stay
Ajay Kumar Parmar v. State of Rajasthan
Chitresh Kumar Chopra Vs. State (NCT of Delhi ) [(2009) 16 SCC 605]
Major E.G. Barsay vs. State of Bombay (1962) 2 SCR 195
Musheer Khan @ Badsha Khan & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of MP vs. Mohan Lal Soni
Yogesh @ Sachin Jagdish Joshi v. State of Maharashtra reported in AIR 2008 SC 2991
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.