VIKRAM NATH, BHARGAV D.KARIA
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Kodiyatar Manda Amarabhai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.
1. Admit. The learned advocate Ms. Sandhya Natani who appears on caveat waives notice of admission of appeal.
2. With the consent of the learned advocates of both the sides, these appeals are taken up for final hearing as it involves common issue and are accordingly heard together and disposed of by this common judgment and order.
3. For the sake of convenience, Letters Patent Appeal NO. 376/2021 is treated as a lead case. In all the appeals, common issue is with respect to grant of benefit of seniority and continuity of service to the respondents-employees on their reinstatement in service after clearing of CCC/CCC+ computer examination.
4. The factual matrix of each of the respondent-employee in each of the appeal is summarised in the following chart :
| Particulars | Details of the original petitioners appointed as Assistant Clerk (Class-III) at the office of Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Ahmedabad | |||||
| Name | Kodiyatar Manda Amarabhai | Chaudhary Haresh Meghrajbhai | Prajapati Dilipkumar Sendhabhai | Prajapati Manoj Shakarabhai | Chaud | |
State of Maharashtra v. Anita and another reported in (2016) 8 SCC 293
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.