R.M.CHHAYA, NIRZAR S.DESAI
NITINKUMAR AMRUTLAL PANCHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.M.CHHAYA, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied by the order dated 22.6.2021 rendered by the learned Single Judge (Coram: Mr. Bhargav D. Karia, J.) in Special Civil Application no. 1778 of 2017, the appellant – original petitioner has preferred this intra-Court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent.
2. Following facts emerge from the record of the appeal:-
The respondent no.2–Board published an advertisement for the post of Gujarati Stenographer, Grade-III. The appellant herein applied for the said post. As it unfolds from the record of this appeal, the appellant appeared in paper no.1 and scored 77 marks and became qualified for paper no.2 for shorthand test and typing. The petitioner was given 56 marks in paper no.2, however, was not selected and in fact came to be disqualified for the reason that the dictation was taken in longhand. The appellant thereafter filed a representation dated 20.10.2016 and as the same was not replied to, the appellant applied for relevant documents under the Right to Information Act and thereafter, filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter-alia, praying to set aside the select list at Annexure
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.