SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 544

VINEET KOTHARI, B.N.KARIA
KUTCHH DISTRICT PANCHAYAT – Appellant
Versus
JEETUBHA KHANSANGJI JADEJA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR HS MUNSHAW
For the Respondent: MR PRABHAKAR UPADYAY

JUDGMENT :

B.N. KARIA, J.

1. By means of this Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, the Appellant prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 4th May, 2011 passed by the learned Single Judge rejecting the Special Civil Application No. 5620 of 2011 preferred by the Appellant wherein, order dated 31st August, 2010 passed by the Labour Court at Bhuj in Reference (LCB) No. 78 of 2003 was confirmed by directing to reinstate the respondent in service with continuity but without back wages.

2. The factual matrix of the Appeal is described as under:-

    2.1 The Respondent herein was provided work purely on temporary, adhoc and daily wages basis depending upon the administrative requirement during the monsoon season between 29th September, 1994 to January, 1998 without following due procedure of recruitment due to administrative exigencies. The Respondent had never worked continuously for 240 days in any of the year from 1994 to 1998. However, the Respondent approached the Labour Court at Bhuj, Kutchh by way of filing Reference (LCB) No. 78 of 2003, after more than five years praying for reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages on the ground that he was illegally and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top